Hi Yerpo, Sorry to write you in English, I don't speak Slovene, I have seen you put a cleanup logo on the different page I have created. I really think that Beuchat has a place on the Slovene eidtion of Wikipedia. As you have seen on the text I wrote, Beuchat has created a large part of the scuba diving equipment. This brand is also the oldest brand.
- Hi. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against the article being here. It's just that the more unusual facts should be supported by independent reliable sources, not just the Beauchat corporate website. By the way, how did you translate the articles? They're almost correct linguisticaly, except for some minor details. Main thing is that the adjective goes on the right side of the noun in Slovenian language, not the opposite as in English. For example, it's "podvodna puška Tarzan", not "Tarzan podvodna puška". --Yerpo Ha? 09:29, 3. maj 2009 (CEST)
Hi, apologise for my misunderstanding, I thought you would like to clean the article about Beuchat and Georges Beuchat. By the way, can you tell me what kind of unusual facts need to be supported by independent and reliable sources for Georges Beuchat article? Noted for Beuchat company article, I will find sources in the coming days. I would like also to display the Beuchat logo as you can see on the French or English version but I haven't succeed, can you let me know how to proceed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Petit_logo_court.jpg). For the translation I have a friend in Slovenia and I have asked him some help to translate from the Englidh version. --Elahk09
- The article Georges Beuchat is more or less ok as far as the facts are concerned, it's just that we have here a bit different guidelines about the introduction for biographies. I took the time and fixed it myself, so it's good now. As for the logo, you must be in the "autoconfirmed users" group to upload images, which is after 20 edits and 4 days since registering. --Yerpo Ha? 12:51, 3. maj 2009 (CEST)
Thanks for the Georges Beuchat article. Regarding the Beuchat page I have found this very old style website http://morton.free.fr/photogb.htm, do you think it could fit the requirment of independent reliable sources? Concerning the logo, the 20 edits and 4 days are by languages or in total, if this is by languages, I don't think I will be able to write 20 edits in Slovene --Elahk09
- Sorry, but that page doesn't seem very reliable. Read what they say about adequate sources on English Wikipedia - en:Wikipedia:Verifiability and en:Wikipedia:Reliable sources; we use similar standards here. The phrase "world leader in diving equipment" reads very much like an empty marketing boast if it isn't backed by, for example, market research results published by an independent organization or a prominent newspaper. The same thing that you wrote in English Wiki will probably be challenged as well, when someone notices it.