Wikipedija:Smetenje: Razlika med redakcijama

Izbrisana vsebina Dodana vsebina
m v delu
Vrstica 48:
== <span id="LINK" /><span id="LINKS" />Spam zunanjih povezav ==
{{shortcut|WP:LINKSPAM|WP:SPAM#LINK|WP:SPAMLINK|WP:SPAMLINKS}}
{{main|Wikipedija:Zunanje povezave#Neželene povezave|Wikipedija:Konflikt interesov|l1=Neželene zunanje povezave}}
{{main|Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|l1=Links normally to be avoided}}
Dodajanje zunanjih povezav v članek ali na uporabniško stran z namenom promocije spletne strani ali izdelka ni dovoljeno in se obravnava kot spam. Čeprav se določene povezave pod nekaterimi pogoji lahko dovolijo, vendar bo ponavljajoče dodajanje povezav lahko pripeljalo do tega, da se bodo odstranile vse.
Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. Although the specific links may be allowed under some circumstances, repeatedly adding links will in most cases result in all of them being removed.
 
=== SourceNadlegovanje solicitings strani virov ===
Nadlegovanje s strani virov so sporočila na pogovornih straneh člankov, ki s prošnjami nadlegujejo urejevalce naj za razširitev članka uporabijo določen zunanji vir. Vsak članek v Wikipediji se lahko razširja, ni pa primerno reči "vsi članki tipa X se lahko razširijo z uporabo vira Y".
Source solicitations are messages on article talk pages which explicitly solicit editors to use a specific external source to expand an article. The current consensus on Wikipedia is that templates, categories and other forms of anonymous solicitation are inappropriate. Every article on Wikipedia can be expanded as a matter of course, but the question is in the details on a per-article basis. It is not possible to simply say "all articles of X type can be expanded using Y source".
 
Ne obstaja trdno pravilo, ko se prestopi meja o poskusu legitimne izboljšave članka v spam članek. Tukaj je za razmislek podanih nekaj smernic in vprašanj:
There is no hard rule on when this crosses over from being a legitimate attempt to improve the article into being internal spam, but some guidelines and questions to consider:
*Je bilo nadlegovanje narejeno anonimno preko uporabe predloge ali Kategorije?
*Is the solicitation being made anonymously through the use of a template or Category?
*Je bilo nadlegovanje istočasno narejeno v več člankih, še posebno če si članki niso sorodni?
*Is the solicitation being duplicated across many articles at the same time, particularly when the articles relate to different topics?
*Ali je potekala diskusija o tem zakaj naj se vr uporabi v določenih člankih?
*Has there been no discussion (of a specific and substantive nature) on why the source should be used in each article?
*Je vir sporen, tak, ki nima uredniškega preverjanja, (glej [[Wikipedija:Zanesljivi viri]])?
*Is the source controversial, such as being non-peer reviewed, old or [[polemic]] (see [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]])?
*Je vir reklamen?
*Is the source a commercial one?
 
===Spam zunanjih povezav, ki jih ustvarijo boti===
===External link spamming with bots===
A few parties now appear to have a spambot capable of spamming wikis from several different wiki engines, analogous to the submitter scripts for guestbooks and blogs. They have a database of a few hundred wikis. Typically they insert external links. Like [[blog spam]], their aim is to improve their [[search engine optimization|search engine rankings]], not to directly advertise their product.
 
Vrstica 78:
Even if they are related to the subject or is an official page for the subject, external links containing affiliate or referral codes are considered spam.
 
=== VideosVideo posnetki ===
 
Adding links to online free videos that promote a site or product is not allowed [see exception below]. Often these videos have been uploaded in violation of their copyright, which adds an additional reason for not linking to them. A video is a spamming video if: