Absurdizem: Razlika med redakcijama

Izbrisana vsebina Dodana vsebina
Brez povzetka urejanja
Brez povzetka urejanja
Vrstica 7:
== Osrednje misli in specifike filozofije absurda ==
Filozofija absurda, ki jo je [[Albert Camus|Camus]] začel v [[Mit o Sizifu|Mitu o Sizifu]] (1942) in nadaljeval v [[Uporni človek|Upornem človeku]] (1952), je sicer zelo sorodna [[Eksistencializem|eksistencializmu]], saj obe priznavata nesmiselnost življenja, vendar rešitev pojmujeta drugače. Čeprav sta si absurdizem in [[eksistencializem]] zelo podobna, se ne smeta enačiti, saj [[Albert Camus|Camus]] v [[Mit o Sizifu|Mitu o Sizifu]] jasno opredeli stališče absurdizma kot [[Antifilozofija|antifilozofije]] - [[Filozofija|filozofije]], ki zanika možnost [[Racionalizem|racionalne]] razlage sveta in [[Religija|vero]] opredeli kot beg pred nesmislom. Zanika torej vse možnosti, od človeka pa zahteva, da se s svojo nezmožnostjo razumevanja sveta in osmišljanja svojega življenja sprijazni, jo ponotranji in tako postane absurdni človek. Ideal absurdnega človeka [[Albert Camus|Camus]] vidi v antičnem liku [[Sizif]], ki si ga zamišlja srečnega, kljub njegovem neskončnem, nesmiselnem in zelo napornem delu.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1">{{Navedi knjigo|title=Mit o Sizifu : esej o absurdnem - spremna beseda|url=http://worldcat.org/oclc/924214065|publisher=Cankarjeva Založba|date=1980|oclc=924214065|first=Zoja Skušek-Močnik|last=Skušek-Močnik|location=Ljubljana|page=445-462}}</ref>
 
=== Samomor ===
 
=== Absurdni človek ===
Vrstica 40 ⟶ 42:
 
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
|
{|
|+'''''Basic relationships between existentialism, absurdism and nihilism'''''
!
!
![[Christian existentialism|Monotheistic existentialism]]
![[Atheistic existentialism]]
!Absurdism
![[Nihilism]]
|-
|1.
|There is such a thing as ''meaning'' or ''value'':| {{Yes}}| {{Yes}}
|It is a [[logical possibility]].| {{No}}
|-
|2.
|There is inherent meaning in the universe:| {{Yes}}, but the individual must have come to the knowledge of God.| {{No}}| {{No}}| {{No}}
|-
|3.
|The ''pursuit'' of meaning may have meaning in itself:| {{Yes}}| {{Yes}}
|Such a pursuit can and should generate meaning for an individual, but death still renders the activity "ultimately" meaningless.| {{No}}
|-
|4.
|The individual's construction of any type of meaning is possible:| {{Yes}}, though this meaning would eventually incorporate God, being the creator of the universe and the "meaning" itself.| {{Yes}}, meaning-making in a world without inherent meaning is the goal of existentialism.| {{Yes}}, though it must face up to the Absurd, which means embracing the transient, personal nature of our meaning-making projects and the way they are nullified by death.<ref name="camus"/>| {{No}}
|-
|5.
|There is resolution to the individual's desire to seek meaning:| {{Yes}}, the creation of one's own meaning involving God.| {{Yes}}, the creation of one's own meaning.
|Embracing the absurd can allow one to find joy and meaning in one's own life, but the only "resolution" is in eventual annihilation by death.| {{No}}
|}
|}