Jezus Kristus: Razlika med redakcijama

}}

{{krščanstvo}}

 

Večina sodobnih poznavalcev [[antika|antike]] se strinja, da je Jezus dejansko obstajal{{efn|In a 2011 review of the state of modern scholarship, [[Bart Ehrman]] wrote, "He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees".<ref>{{cite book|first=Bart|last=Ehrman|year=2011|title=Forged: writing in the name of God – Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are|isbn=978-0-06-207863-6 |url=http://books.google.com/?id=MtOMO8i4GLoC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false |publisher=HarperCollins |page=285}}</ref> [[Richard A. Burridge]] states: "There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church's imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more".<ref>{{cite book|title=Jesus Now and Then|first1= Richard A.|last1= Burridge |first2= Graham |last2= Gould|year=2004| isbn= 978-0-8028-0977-3 |page=34 |publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing}}</ref> [[Robert M. Price]] does not believe that Jesus existed, but agrees that this perspective runs against the views of the majority of scholars.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|first=Robert M. |last=Price |title=Jesus at the Vanishing Point|encyclopedia= The Historical Jesus: Five Views|editor-last1= Beilby|editor-last2= Eddy|year= 2009 |publisher= InterVarsity| isbn= 978-0-8308-7853-6 | editor-first= James K.|pages=55, 61 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=O33P7xrFnLQC&pg=PA55#v=onepage&q&f=false |editor2-first= Paul R.}}</ref> [[James Dunn (theologian)|James D.G. Dunn]] calls the theories of Jesus' non-existence "a thoroughly dead thesis".<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title=Paul's understanding of the death of Jesus|encyclopedia=Sacrifice and Redemption|first= Stephen W.|last= Sykes |year=2007| publisher= Cambridge University Press| isbn= 978-0-521-04460-8|pages=35–36}}</ref> [[Michael Grant (author)|Michael Grant]] (a [[classicist]]) wrote in 1977, "In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary".<ref name=Grant1977>{{cite book|first=Michael|last=Grant|title=Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels|publisher=Scribner's|year=1977|isbn=978-0-684-14889-2|page=200}}</ref> [[Robert E. Van Voorst]] states that biblical scholars and classical historians regard theories of non-existence of Jesus as effectively refuted.{{sfn|Van Voorst|2000|p=16}}<!--Note that this is a different statement with a different qualifier from the existence statement-->}} in da je bil [[judje|judovski]] [[rabin]] iz [[Galileja|Galileje]], ki je ustno razširjal svoj nauk.<ref>James D. G. Dunn, ''The Oral Gospel Tradition'', Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2013. [http://www.google.de/search?tbm=bks&hl=en&q=+%22teachers+in+the+earliest+communities51+is+best+explained+by+the+communities%27+reliance+on+them+as+repositories+of+community+tradition.52+This+in+turn+suggests+that+the+teachers+would+be+responsible+for+a+body+of+teaching%2C+presumably+what+Luke+refers+to+as+the+apostles+teaching%22#hl=en&q=%22Second+Temple+Iudaism%22+%22was+predominantly+an+oral+society%22+-Judaism&tbm=bks pp 290-291]</ref> [[Krst]]il ga je [[Janez Krstnik]]. [[Križanje|Križan]] je bil v [[Jeruzalem]]u po ukazu rimskega prefekta [[Poncij Pilat|Poncija Pilata]].{{sfn|Levine|2006|p=4}} Učenjaki so osnovali več portretov zgodovinskega Jezusa, ki ga pogosto prikazujejo kot nosilca ene od naslednjih vlog: voditelj [[apokalipsa|apokaliptičnega]] gibanja, mesija, karizmatični zdravilec, [[modrec]] in [[filozof]] ali družbeni reformator, ki se je zavzemal za enakost vseh ljudi.{{sfn|Köstenberger| Kellum | Quarles |2009 |pp= 124–125}} Primerjali so [[Nova zaveza|novozavezne]] zapise z nekrščanskimi zgodovinskimi zapisi, da bi sestavili [[kronologija|kronologijo]] Jezusovega življenja. Najširše uporabljena [[koledarska doba]], v kateri je trenutno leto {{CURRENTYEAR}} (okrajšano kot [[Anno Domini|po Kr.]] ali n. št.), temelji na [[srednji vek|srednjeveški]] oceni leta Jezusovega rojstva.