Jezus Kristus: Razlika med redakcijama
Izbrisana vsebina Dodana vsebina
m + po en; {{v delu}} |
prevod |
||
Vrstica 1:
{{Infopolje Oseba
|name = Jezus Kristus
Vrstica 110 ⟶ 108:
* [[Svetonij]]
==
Leta 70 je v roke Rimljanov padel Jeruzalem in mesto so povsem uničili. Zaradi tega je obstanek predmetov iz 1. stoletja Jude zelo redek. Skoraj nobenega neposrednega zaznamka ni o zgodovini judovstva od konca 1. stoletja do 2. stoletja.{{sfn|Levine|2006|p=24-25}}<ref name=Koester382>[[Helmut Koester]] ''Introduction to the New Testament'', Vol. 1: History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Berlin: [[de Gruyter Press]], 1995 p 382</ref> Čeprav Evzebijeva poročila (''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Ecclesiastical History]]'' III 5.3) govorijo o tem, da so prvi kristjani prebežali v [[Peleja|Pelejo]], tik preden je Jeruzalem doletelo uničenje, moramo sprejeti dejstvo, da nas ni dosegel noben predmet iz zgodnje jeruzalemske cerkve.<ref>[[Margaret M. Mitchell]] "The Cambridge History of Christianity, Volume 1: Origins to Constantine" Cambridge University Press 2006 p 298</ref> V zgodovini Cerkve so se pojavljali mnogi predmeti, opredeljeni kot Kristusove relikvije, čeprav so se o njim porajali tudi dvomi. [[Erazem Rotterdamski]], katoliški teolog iz 16. stoletja, je sarkastično pisal o pojavu relikvij in številu stavb, ki bi jih lahko postavili, češ da so iz lesa Kristusovega križa.{{sfn|Dillenberger|1999|p=5}} Medtem ko strokovnjaki razpravljajo, ali je bil Jezus križan s tremi žeblji ali s štirimi, se v Evropi kot relikvije časti najmanj 30 žebljev.<ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle =Holy Nails|title=Holy Nails|first= Herbert|last=Thurston}}</ref>
Some relics, such as purported remnants of the [[Crown of Thorns]], receive only a modest number of pilgrims, while the [[Shroud of Turin]] (which is associated with an approved [[Catholic devotion]] to the [[Holy Face of Jesus]]), have received millions,<ref>{{cite news|last=Delaney|first=Sarah|title=Shroud exposition closes with more than 2 million visits|url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1002157.htm|agency=Catholic News Service |date=May 24, 2010}}</ref> including [[pope]]s [[John Paul II]] and [[Pope Benedict XVI|Benedict XVI]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Wojtyła |first=Karol J.|title=Pope John Paul II's address in Turin Cathedral|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/travels/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_24051998_sindone_en.html|publisher=Vatican Publishing House|date=May 24, 1998}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Squires|first=Nick|title=Pope Benedict says Shroud of Turin authentic burial robe of Jesus|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/0503/Pope-Benedict-says-Shroud-of-Turin-authentic-burial-robe-of-Jesus|newspaper=Christian Science Monitor|date=May 3, 2010}}</ref> There is no scholarly consensus in favor for the authenticity of any relic attributed to Jesus.<ref>{{cite book|last=Nickell|first=Joe|title=Relics of the Christ|year=2007|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=978-0-8131-3731-5|page=191|url=https://books.google.com/?id=J-m_mblG-A8C&pg=PT210&dq=most+scholars+jesus+relics+authentic#v=snippet&q=not%20a%20single%2C%20reliably%20authenticated%20relic%20of%20Jesus%20exists&f=false}}</ref>{{efn|Polarized conclusions regarding the Shroud of Turin remain.<ref>Habermas, Gary R. "Shroud of Turin." ''The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization'' (2011). {{DOI|10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc1257}}</ref> According to former ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' editor [[Philip Ball]], "it's fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever. Not least, the nature of the image and how it was fixed on the cloth remain deeply puzzling".<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Ball | first1 = P. | title = Material witness: Shrouded in mystery | doi = 10.1038/nmat2170 | journal = Nature Materials | volume = 7 | issue = 5 | page = 349 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18432204 }}</ref>}}▼
▲
== Viri in opombe ==
{{opombe|2}}
|