Wikipedija

Jezus Kristus: Razlika med redakcijama

Pregledujte zgodovino interaktivno
← Starejše urejanjeNovejše urejanje →
Izbrisana vsebina Dodana vsebina
VizualnoVikibesedilo
m + po en; {{v delu}}
prevod
Vrstica 1:
{{v delu}}
 
{{Infopolje Oseba
|name = Jezus Kristus
Vrstica 110 ⟶ 108:
* [[Svetonij]]
 
== Associated relicsRelikvije ==
Leta 70 je v roke Rimljanov padel Jeruzalem in mesto so povsem uničili. Zaradi tega je obstanek predmetov iz 1. stoletja Jude zelo redek. Skoraj nobenega neposrednega zaznamka ni o zgodovini judovstva od konca 1. stoletja do 2. stoletja.{{sfn|Levine|2006|p=24-25}}<ref name=Koester382>[[Helmut Koester]] ''Introduction to the New Testament'', Vol. 1: History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Berlin: [[de Gruyter Press]], 1995 p 382</ref> Čeprav Evzebijeva poročila (''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Ecclesiastical History]]'' III 5.3) govorijo o tem, da so prvi kristjani prebežali v [[Peleja|Pelejo]], tik preden je Jeruzalem doletelo uničenje, moramo sprejeti dejstvo, da nas ni dosegel noben predmet iz zgodnje jeruzalemske cerkve.<ref>[[Margaret M. Mitchell]] "The Cambridge History of Christianity, Volume 1: Origins to Constantine" Cambridge University Press 2006 p 298</ref> V zgodovini Cerkve so se pojavljali mnogi predmeti, opredeljeni kot Kristusove relikvije, čeprav so se o njim porajali tudi dvomi. [[Erazem Rotterdamski]], katoliški teolog iz 16. stoletja, je sarkastično pisal o pojavu relikvij in številu stavb, ki bi jih lahko postavili, češ da so iz lesa Kristusovega križa.{{sfn|Dillenberger|1999|p=5}} Medtem ko strokovnjaki razpravljajo, ali je bil Jezus križan s tremi žeblji ali s štirimi, se v Evropi kot relikvije časti najmanj 30 žebljev.<ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle =Holy Nails|title=Holy Nails|first= Herbert|last=Thurston}}</ref>
{{Main|Relics associated with Jesus}}
The total destruction that ensued with the [[Siege of Jerusalem (70)|siege of Jerusalem]] by the Romans in AD 70 made the survival of items from first century Judea very rare and almost no direct records survive about the history of Judaism from the last part of the first century through the second century.{{sfn|Levine|2006|p=24-25}}<ref name=Koester382>[[Helmut Koester]] ''Introduction to the New Testament'', Vol. 1: History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Berlin: [[de Gruyter Press]], 1995 p 382</ref>{{efn|[[Flavius Josephus]] writing (about 5 years later, c. AD 75) in the ''[[The Jewish War]]'' (Book VII 1.1) stated that Jerusalem had been flattened to the point that "there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited."<ref>Flavius Josephus, ''The Jewish War'' Book VII, section 1.1"</ref> And once what was left of the ruins of Jerusalem had been turned into the Roman settlement of [[Aelia Capitolina]], no Jews were allowed to set foot in it.<ref name=Koester382/>}} [[Margaret M. Mitchell]] writes that although [[Eusebius]] reports (''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Ecclesiastical History]]'' III 5.3) that the early Christians left Jerusalem for [[Pella, Jordan|Pella]] just before Jerusalem was subjected to the final lock down, we must accept that no first hand Christian items from the early Jerusalem Church have reached us.<ref>[[Margaret M. Mitchell]] "The Cambridge History of Christianity, Volume 1: Origins to Constantine" Cambridge University Press 2006 p 298</ref> However, throughout the history of Christianity a number of [[relic]]s attributed to Jesus have been claimed, although doubt has been cast on them. The 16th-century Catholic theologian [[Erasmus]] wrote sarcastically about the proliferation of relics and the number of buildings that could have been constructed from the wood claimed to be from the [[True Cross|cross used in the Crucifixion]].{{sfn|Dillenberger|1999|p=5}} Similarly, while experts debate whether Jesus was crucified with three nails or with four, at least thirty [[holy nail]]s continue to be venerated as relics across Europe.<ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle =Holy Nails|title=Holy Nails|first= Herbert|last=Thurston}}</ref>
 
Some relics, such as purported remnants of the [[Crown of Thorns]], receive only a modest number of pilgrims, while the [[Shroud of Turin]] (which is associated with an approved [[Catholic devotion]] to the [[Holy Face of Jesus]]), have received millions,<ref>{{cite news|last=Delaney|first=Sarah|title=Shroud exposition closes with more than 2 million visits|url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1002157.htm|agency=Catholic News Service |date=May 24, 2010}}</ref> including [[pope]]s [[John Paul II]] and [[Pope Benedict XVI|Benedict XVI]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Wojtyła |first=Karol J.|title=Pope John Paul II's address in Turin Cathedral|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/travels/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_24051998_sindone_en.html|publisher=Vatican Publishing House|date=May 24, 1998}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Squires|first=Nick|title=Pope Benedict says Shroud of Turin authentic burial robe of Jesus|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/0503/Pope-Benedict-says-Shroud-of-Turin-authentic-burial-robe-of-Jesus|newspaper=Christian Science Monitor|date=May 3, 2010}}</ref> There is no scholarly consensus in favor for the authenticity of any relic attributed to Jesus.<ref>{{cite book|last=Nickell|first=Joe|title=Relics of the Christ|year=2007|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=978-0-8131-3731-5|page=191|url=https://books.google.com/?id=J-m_mblG-A8C&pg=PT210&dq=most+scholars+jesus+relics+authentic#v=snippet&q=not%20a%20single%2C%20reliably%20authenticated%20relic%20of%20Jesus%20exists&f=false}}</ref>{{efn|Polarized conclusions regarding the Shroud of Turin remain.<ref>Habermas, Gary R. "Shroud of Turin." ''The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization'' (2011). {{DOI|10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc1257}}</ref> According to former ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' editor [[Philip Ball]], "it's fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever. Not least, the nature of the image and how it was fixed on the cloth remain deeply puzzling".<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Ball | first1 = P. | title = Material witness: Shrouded in mystery | doi = 10.1038/nmat2170 | journal = Nature Materials | volume = 7 | issue = 5 | page = 349 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18432204 }}</ref>}}▼
 
 
▲SomeNekatere relicsrelikvije, suchkot asso purportedponarejeni remnantsostanki oftrnjeve the [[Crown of Thorns]]krone, receiveniso onlyimeli aveliko modest number of pilgrims, while thečastilcev. [[ShroudTorinski of Turinprt]] (whichpovezan isje associatedz withodobrenim ankatoliškim approvedčeščenjem [[Catholic''Jezusovega devotion]]obličja)'' toje thečastilo [[Holyže Facemilijone of Jesus]])ljudi, havevključno receiveds millions,<ref>{{citepapežem news|last=Delaney|first=Sarah|title=Shroud[[Papež expositionJanez closesPavel with more than 2 million visits|url=http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1002157II.htm|agency=CatholicJanezom News Service |date=May 24, 2010}}</ref> including [[pope]]s [[John PaulPavlom II.]] andin [[PopePapež BenedictBenedikt XVI.|BenedictBenediktom XVI]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Wojtyła |first=Karol J.|title=Pope John Paul II's address in Turin Cathedral|url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/travels/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_24051998_sindone_en.html|publisher=Vatican Publishing House|date=May 24, 1998}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Squires|first=Nick|title=Pope Benedict says Shroud of Turin authentic burial robe of Jesus|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2010/0503/Pope-Benedict-says-Shroud-of-Turin-authentic-burial-robe-of-Jesus|newspaper=Christian Science Monitor|date=May 3, 2010}}</ref> ThereMed isstrokovnjaki noni scholarlysoglasja consensusv inprid favoravtentičnosti forkaterekoli therelikvije, authenticitypripisane of any relic attributed to JesusJezusu.<ref>{{cite book|last=Nickell|first=Joe|title=Relics of the Christ|year=2007|publisher=University Press of Kentucky|isbn=978-0-8131-3731-5|page=191|url=https://books.google.com/?id=J-m_mblG-A8C&pg=PT210&dq=most+scholars+jesus+relics+authentic#v=snippet&q=not%20a%20single%2C%20reliably%20authenticated%20relic%20of%20Jesus%20exists&f=false}}</ref>{{efn|Polarized conclusions regarding the Shroud of Turin remain.<ref>Habermas, Gary R. "Shroud of Turin." ''The Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization'' (2011). {{DOI|10.1002/9780470670606.wbecc1257}}</ref> According to former ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' editor [[Philip Ball]], "it's fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever. Not least, the nature of the image and how it was fixed on the cloth remain deeply puzzling".<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Ball | first1 = P. | title = Material witness: Shrouded in mystery | doi = 10.1038/nmat2170 | journal = Nature Materials | volume = 7 | issue = 5 | page = 349 | year = 2008 | pmid = 18432204 }}</ref>}}
== Viri in opombe ==
{{opombe|2}}
Pridobljeno iz »https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jezus_Kristus«