Politična desnica: Razlika med redakcijama

Izbrisana vsebina Dodana vsebina
Vujacicm (pogovor | prispevki)
Nova stran z vsebino: {{Redirect|Right wing|the sports term|Winger (sports)|the term used in Psychology|Right-wing authoritarianism}} {{Party politics}} In politics, '''''Right''''', '''''ri...
(ni razlike)

Redakcija: 00:33, 8. november 2011

Predloga:Party politics

In politics, Right, right-wing and rightist generally refer to support for a hierarchical society justified on the basis of an appeal to natural law or tradition.[1][2][3][4][5] To varying degrees, the Right rejects the egalitarian objectives of left-wing politics, claiming that the imposition of equality is detrimental to society.[6] The terms Right and Left were coined during the French Revolution, referring to seating arrangements in parliament; those who sat on the right supported preserving the institutions of the Ancien Régime (the monarchy, the aristocracy and the established church).[7][8][9][10] Use of the term "Right" became more prominent after the second restoration of the French monarchy in 1815 with the Ultra-royalists.[11] Right-wing politics is a more loosely defined term than left-wing politics, because it largely developed as a response to its leftist counterpart.[12] Historically, the right-wing was mostly made up of traditionalist conservatives and reactionaries, but it now includes liberal conservatives, classical liberals and Christian democrats[13] as well as some nationalists.[10]

  1. T. Alexander Smith, Raymond Tatalovich. Cultures at war: moral conflicts in western democracies. Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd, 2003. Pp 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.' In other words, the sociological perspective sees preservationist politics as a right-wing attempt to defend privilege within the social hierarchy.
  2. Left and right: the significance of a political distinction, Norberto Bobbio and Allan Cameron, pg. 37, University of Chicago Press, 1997.
  3. Seymour Martin Lipset, cited in Fuchs, D., and Klingemann, H. 1990. The left-right schema. Pp.203–34 in Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed.M.Jennings et al. Berlin:de Gruyter
  4. Lukes, Steven. 'Epilogue: The Grand Dichotomy of the Twentieth Century': concluding chapter to T. Ball and R. Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. Pp.610–612
  5. Clark, William. Capitalism, not Globalism. University of Michigan Press, 2003. ISBN 0-472-11293-7, 9780472112937
  6. Left and right: the significance of a political distinction, Norberto Bobbio and Allan Cameron, pg. 68, University of Chicago Press, 1997.
  7. The Architecture of Parliaments: Legislative Houses and Political Culture Charles T. Goodsell British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Jul., 1988), pp. 287–302
  8. Gerhard Linski, Current Issues and Research in Macrosociology, Brill Archive, 1984, pg; 59
  9. Barry Clark, Political Economy: A Comparative Approach, Praeger Paperback, 1998, pgs; 33–34.
  10. 10,0 10,1 Napaka pri navajanju: Neveljavna oznaka <ref>; sklici, poimenovani Knapp, ne vsebujejo besedila (glej stran pomoči).
  11. Realms of memory: conflicts and divisions (1996), ed. Pierre Nora, "Right and Left" by Marcel Gauchet, p. 247-8
  12. Roger Eatwell, Noël O'Sullivan The Nature of the right: American and European politics and political thought since 1789, Twayne Publishers, 1990.
  13. Napaka pri navajanju: Neveljavna oznaka <ref>; sklici, poimenovani Trans, ne vsebujejo besedila (glej stran pomoči).